vikramy
06-05 03:00 PM
You can use EAD with current employer. I think your company has to do the change your I9 form to EAD. You don't need to inform as you are not changing any company.
Hi
My H1 is valid until 2010 Feb.
I am also having EAD till 2011 June.
I have been with my employer all along.... and prefer to stay with same employer till GC.
I DONT want to apply for my H1 extension since they are asking lot of questions like Contract details etc with RFE's.
My Q is - Can i use EAD with my EXISTING employer or EAD should be used for only NEW employer based on AC21?
If i use EAD with my current employer, should i have to inform uscis(any process involved)?
Please suggest...
Thanks for any suggestions
Hi
My H1 is valid until 2010 Feb.
I am also having EAD till 2011 June.
I have been with my employer all along.... and prefer to stay with same employer till GC.
I DONT want to apply for my H1 extension since they are asking lot of questions like Contract details etc with RFE's.
My Q is - Can i use EAD with my EXISTING employer or EAD should be used for only NEW employer based on AC21?
If i use EAD with my current employer, should i have to inform uscis(any process involved)?
Please suggest...
Thanks for any suggestions
wallpaper Born This Way – Lady Gaga
rodnyb
03-03 01:12 PM
http://kpkgs.com/files/The_Employment_Based_Green_Card_Process_and_the_Dr amatic_Negative_Impact_of_Country_Based_Quotas_on_ persons_of_Indian_Origin_Feb_20102.pdf
Anyone knows the background of this recapture? This is the first time I know congress had a law for it in 2000
Solution
The immediate solution is full accountability of all pending applicants for employment based immigrant visas both at USCIS and DOS. Without accurate data, it is difficult to hold the agencies accountable for their actions or inactions.
Another solution is to �recapture� lost visas. Between 1994 and 2006, USCIS underutilized the visa numbers by approving less than the 140,000 employment based applications each year even though USCIS had more than enough applications pending. Due to the statutory calculation method (explained more fully by USCIS and DOS on their websites), USCIS�s failure to timely process a sufficient number of applications resulted in the loss of approximately 349,000 visa numbers that could not be used in future years since the law prevents usage in future years. In 2000, Congress authorized the use of 130,000 these �lost� visa numbers by what has come to be known as the �visa recapture� method. However, approximately 219,000 numbers have not been �recaptured�. The current worldwide pending cases in all employment based categories is approximately 340,000 applicants. A one‐time recapture of the 219,000 unused visa numbers could go a long way to eliminating this backlog and bringing much needed relief to many applicants who currently face the prospect of becoming residents of the United States after they retire.
Anyone knows the background of this recapture? This is the first time I know congress had a law for it in 2000
Solution
The immediate solution is full accountability of all pending applicants for employment based immigrant visas both at USCIS and DOS. Without accurate data, it is difficult to hold the agencies accountable for their actions or inactions.
Another solution is to �recapture� lost visas. Between 1994 and 2006, USCIS underutilized the visa numbers by approving less than the 140,000 employment based applications each year even though USCIS had more than enough applications pending. Due to the statutory calculation method (explained more fully by USCIS and DOS on their websites), USCIS�s failure to timely process a sufficient number of applications resulted in the loss of approximately 349,000 visa numbers that could not be used in future years since the law prevents usage in future years. In 2000, Congress authorized the use of 130,000 these �lost� visa numbers by what has come to be known as the �visa recapture� method. However, approximately 219,000 numbers have not been �recaptured�. The current worldwide pending cases in all employment based categories is approximately 340,000 applicants. A one‐time recapture of the 219,000 unused visa numbers could go a long way to eliminating this backlog and bringing much needed relief to many applicants who currently face the prospect of becoming residents of the United States after they retire.
sunny1000
09-28 09:13 AM
Is it only on Oct 1st or the entire week? My in laws are going for visa interview on October 5th
Just the 10/1/07. See their website.
Just the 10/1/07. See their website.
2011 lady gaga, orn this way,
coolfun
08-03 12:07 AM
I am on an H-1B visa I had a confusion regarding my wife's case. She is on H4 visa and her H4 visa was extended to September, 2009 when I changed my employer (XXX) last year. However, her passport carries H4 visa which expires in Oct. 2007 (this was through my previous employer, YYY). Both our I-485 are pending and we both received our EAD last month. She wants to use her EAD to work in future.
A twist is that a consultant had filed for her H-1B this April and we don't know if her H-1B came through or not. He is not telling us. We just don't want to deal with that scumbag. Can we just ignore him and forget about it? Since her I-485 is pending she has a lawful status (Pending AOS), right? Please let me know what you think.
A twist is that a consultant had filed for her H-1B this April and we don't know if her H-1B came through or not. He is not telling us. We just don't want to deal with that scumbag. Can we just ignore him and forget about it? Since her I-485 is pending she has a lawful status (Pending AOS), right? Please let me know what you think.
more...
sreeanne
02-05 11:32 PM
Just check this
http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=d502194d3e88d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1RCR D&vgnextchannel=1847c9ee2f82b010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD
where USCIS clealy specifies
Renewal EAD: You cannot file more than 120 days before your original employment authorization expires.
They may deny it instead of rejecting and finally u will end up loosing EAD fees.
http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=d502194d3e88d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1RCR D&vgnextchannel=1847c9ee2f82b010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD
where USCIS clealy specifies
Renewal EAD: You cannot file more than 120 days before your original employment authorization expires.
They may deny it instead of rejecting and finally u will end up loosing EAD fees.
toronto1999
10-16 12:43 PM
Thank you! Hopefully 8c/page is not big money for me.
more...
MujheGCdo
10-04 02:18 AM
My lawyers para legals screwed up my case and sent the initial application
to California instead of Nebraska:mad:.
My case was filed on jul 30,but till now I have not received anything.
While all my friends, colleagues have received their receipt notice and finger print. On calling CSC they refused the divulge anything and told me to wait for 90 days. My lawyer says it will be processed and my case is safe. But I do not trust him as he is the one who screwed it up.
Is there anyone else whose applicationwas sent to the wrong service centre
and if so have they received their receipt notices?
This is for all the gurus out here in this forum. What are your views?
Will my application be accepted by USCIS and which centre will it be processed.
to California instead of Nebraska:mad:.
My case was filed on jul 30,but till now I have not received anything.
While all my friends, colleagues have received their receipt notice and finger print. On calling CSC they refused the divulge anything and told me to wait for 90 days. My lawyer says it will be processed and my case is safe. But I do not trust him as he is the one who screwed it up.
Is there anyone else whose applicationwas sent to the wrong service centre
and if so have they received their receipt notices?
This is for all the gurus out here in this forum. What are your views?
Will my application be accepted by USCIS and which centre will it be processed.
2010 edition artwork. Lady
kirupa
11-07 12:39 PM
I certainly can write about this, and I may do so in the future. Were you able to get your question resolved? :)
more...
sw33t
07-22 12:19 PM
Dear Members:
If you live in the State of Texas, If you have friends or Family in the State of Texas, please sign up/forward the link.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/texasiv
This group is a restricted group. When you sign up, please send a message with a valid phone number. Someone will call to verify your information. This step is to weed out members from other organizations posing as legal immigrants.
PLEASE ADD THE LINK TO THE YAHOO GROUP IN YOUR SIGNATURE.
If you live in the State of Texas, If you have friends or Family in the State of Texas, please sign up/forward the link.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/texasiv
This group is a restricted group. When you sign up, please send a message with a valid phone number. Someone will call to verify your information. This step is to weed out members from other organizations posing as legal immigrants.
PLEASE ADD THE LINK TO THE YAHOO GROUP IN YOUR SIGNATURE.
hair lady gaga born this way
jonty_11
07-14 04:09 PM
I think we need to ask Congress for fixing the LUD mess....C'mon
LUDs mean nothing...Lets instead concentrate on IV initiatives on Home Page. Contact your local chapter for guidance.
LUDs mean nothing...Lets instead concentrate on IV initiatives on Home Page. Contact your local chapter for guidance.
more...
gc28262
07-30 09:01 AM
From Ron Gotcher:
ImmInfo Newsletter:* The effect of an employer withdrawal of an I-140 (http://imminfo.com/News/Newsletter/2010-07/employer-withdrawal-of-I-140.html)
If an employer withdraws an I-140 after it has been approved, however, the employee is entitled to keep the priority date and use it for any subsequently filed I-140. It doesn't matter that the new I-140 may be for a different job, a different employer, a different location, or even a different preference classification. Once an I-140 is approved, the employee "owns" the priority date forever
ImmInfo Newsletter:* The effect of an employer withdrawal of an I-140 (http://imminfo.com/News/Newsletter/2010-07/employer-withdrawal-of-I-140.html)
If an employer withdraws an I-140 after it has been approved, however, the employee is entitled to keep the priority date and use it for any subsequently filed I-140. It doesn't matter that the new I-140 may be for a different job, a different employer, a different location, or even a different preference classification. Once an I-140 is approved, the employee "owns" the priority date forever
hot Lady Gaga Born This Way
redgreen
10-14 01:47 PM
It is mentioned by many that PD should be current at the time of GC approval. Is that right?
I know people from India who got their GC approved when their PD is not current.
One can check this easily in looking for I-485 approvals to people from India who submitted their applications concurrently in EB2 category after say april 2004. Disregard the cases which got approved in July 2007. Still there are many cases remaining invalidating the 'rule'!
I know people from India who got their GC approved when their PD is not current.
One can check this easily in looking for I-485 approvals to people from India who submitted their applications concurrently in EB2 category after say april 2004. Disregard the cases which got approved in July 2007. Still there are many cases remaining invalidating the 'rule'!
more...
house According to a tweet from Lady
good idea
01-27 04:52 PM
It's 2002 published, as other said, I also do not feel if there was need to post such old link.
With owner's consent this thread should be remove.
With owner's consent this thread should be remove.
tattoo Lady Gaga Born This Way 12
CRAZYMONK
07-23 10:41 AM
My H1-B was approved in octubre 2008, I would like to go to my home country but i don't have a visa to be able to come back.
Now my question is:
Having an approved H1-b is a warranty for me to get a visa to come back to the US.
Also carry your educational docuements. They asked me last time when I went to stamping for my H1B Extension, in Feb 09. People over their in the Embassies looking in all means to stop giving the VISAs. So be prepared with all the documents.
Now my question is:
Having an approved H1-b is a warranty for me to get a visa to come back to the US.
Also carry your educational docuements. They asked me last time when I went to stamping for my H1B Extension, in Feb 09. People over their in the Embassies looking in all means to stop giving the VISAs. So be prepared with all the documents.
more...
pictures lady gaga born this way cover
beautifulMind
11-02 08:58 PM
the Company is given guidelines by the lawyer and USCIS and they need to follow those guildeline. I am not interfering. I just want to know if what they did would satisfy the requirements of the PERM recrutiment process. Not sure why you gave me a red dot for this. The AD was posted by HR and I work for a very big university. All i wanted to know if it satisfy PERM requirments...
dresses Music - Lady Gaga-Born This
jettu77
09-28 02:54 PM
^^^
more...
makeup Lady Gaga – Born This Way
arian2002
10-02 10:29 AM
What is your Lawyer's reply to the mess he created?
girlfriend Lady Gaga#39;s Born This Way
o0appleboss0o
01-03 01:16 PM
Hi guys,
I have an urgent case regarding the I-485 initial evidence. I sent out my I-485 application w/ I-864 and I-864A back in November, 2009. I am a F-1 visa holder currently in PhD program with around 21,000 stipend per year. My wife which is the petitioner (I-864) has no income and she filed a I-864 with my stipend in the first I-864 form. Since I am the beneficial and the instruction said that I didn't have to include my W-2 form. My parents in law had a joint account together. My father in law filed another I-864 form with his stipend of 20,000, and my mother in law filed a I-864A form with her stipend of 20,000. They have joint tax returns, and I have given immigration the copy of their 3 years W-2 and 1040 form.
A few days ago, immigration has send me request for initial evidence (I485) with the check marks says
1. The household member on the petitioner/sponsor's form I -864, must submit the federal income tax return submitted to the IRS for the most recent tax year.
2. The household member on the petitioner/sponsors form I-864, and I-864A must submit all supporting tax documentation (W-2s) submitted to the IRS for the most recent tax year.
My question is, I have submitted my parents in law's tax return for 2006 to 2008. we do not have the year 2009 because it is not going to be ready until April. What do they want?
I have an urgent case regarding the I-485 initial evidence. I sent out my I-485 application w/ I-864 and I-864A back in November, 2009. I am a F-1 visa holder currently in PhD program with around 21,000 stipend per year. My wife which is the petitioner (I-864) has no income and she filed a I-864 with my stipend in the first I-864 form. Since I am the beneficial and the instruction said that I didn't have to include my W-2 form. My parents in law had a joint account together. My father in law filed another I-864 form with his stipend of 20,000, and my mother in law filed a I-864A form with her stipend of 20,000. They have joint tax returns, and I have given immigration the copy of their 3 years W-2 and 1040 form.
A few days ago, immigration has send me request for initial evidence (I485) with the check marks says
1. The household member on the petitioner/sponsor's form I -864, must submit the federal income tax return submitted to the IRS for the most recent tax year.
2. The household member on the petitioner/sponsors form I-864, and I-864A must submit all supporting tax documentation (W-2s) submitted to the IRS for the most recent tax year.
My question is, I have submitted my parents in law's tax return for 2006 to 2008. we do not have the year 2009 because it is not going to be ready until April. What do they want?
hairstyles Lady Gaga #39;Born This Way#39;
kaushik58
09-09 11:21 PM
Hi Gurus,
Can Any Body Update Us With Any Latest On This Subjected Issue ?
Recently In I-140 Anybody Got Aproval With 3 Years Degree From Nsc ? I Am Talking About Eb-3 Cases.
I Understood That Something Was Going On But Could Not Get Any News So Far !
Can Anybody Give Lights If There Is Something Positive ?
I Hope Immigration Voice Will Also Take Up This Issue During Rally.
Thanks,
Can Any Body Update Us With Any Latest On This Subjected Issue ?
Recently In I-140 Anybody Got Aproval With 3 Years Degree From Nsc ? I Am Talking About Eb-3 Cases.
I Understood That Something Was Going On But Could Not Get Any News So Far !
Can Anybody Give Lights If There Is Something Positive ?
I Hope Immigration Voice Will Also Take Up This Issue During Rally.
Thanks,
Refugee_New
04-08 01:01 PM
Hello
I received the following LUDs on my I-140
Soft LUD 03/28/08
Soft LUD 03/30/08 (Yeah on Sunday)
Soft LUD 03/31/08
can anyone tell me what is going on? My I-140 filing date is 6/13/2008 EB3 Category(India), NSC
Thanks
This means nothing.
I received the following LUDs on my I-140
Soft LUD 03/28/08
Soft LUD 03/30/08 (Yeah on Sunday)
Soft LUD 03/31/08
can anyone tell me what is going on? My I-140 filing date is 6/13/2008 EB3 Category(India), NSC
Thanks
This means nothing.
dan19
10-25 05:04 PM
Recently my friend filed..It took 25 days
my wife is moving to another employer. they filed her h1b transfer 2 weeks back. does anyone have an estimate on when she should get here receipt???
my wife is moving to another employer. they filed her h1b transfer 2 weeks back. does anyone have an estimate on when she should get here receipt???
No comments:
Post a Comment